Bathsheba inkblot test

https://www.clawscustomboxes.com/80c1jcp Was Bathsheba a victim or a perpetrator? Here is another inkblot test for you.

https://transculturalexchange.org/9hqskpnr The initial details of the story are deceptively simple:

In the spring, at the time when kings go off to war, David sent Joab out with the king’s men and the whole Israelite army. They destroyed the Ammonites and besieged Rabbah. But David remained in Jerusalem.

One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, “Isn’t this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?” Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home. The woman conceived and sent word to David, saying, “I am pregnant.”

https://blog.extraface.com/2024/08/07/kt525gcl OK, so was Bathsheba a seductress who knew what she was doing or was she victimized by a lustful Middle Eastern potentate?

Order Alprazolam Canada Frankly, I have heard sermons that have painted her as a seductress. That is, they argue that she knew her rooftop was visible from the higher heights of the king’s palace. They further argue that, with his being home she had an idea of when he walked the roof, and planned her bath in order to get maximum effect. There are medieval and Victorian paintings which show her clearly in that position. Mind you, none of those sermons paint King David as innocent. Nevertheless, personally, I think that several of those sermons have almost had the “taint” of arguing, “What can you expect when a lusty man sees a naked woman?” That type of argument almost seems to say that human beings are incapable of self-control and self-discipline. Do we wish to say that as Christians?

https://homeupgradespecialist.com/rh7jwle6 At the other end are those interpreters who argue that Bathsheba was a pure victim. The argument is that Middle Eastern potentates of that time period were extremely powerful and had life/death power over their people. Frankly, if you look at some of the dealings of both King Saul and King David, there is significant proof of that. Do you really think that no one in the court knew that Bathsheba had lain with King David? And, when King David sent out his orders to kill Uriah, did you notice that they were obeyed? Certainly, the assumption at both the court and in the army was that what the King wanted was so, regardless of what Old Testament Law might be around.

https://oevenezolano.org/2024/08/uqbgio4 In the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 107 says:

Rab Judah said in Rab’s name: One should never [intentionally] bring himself to the test, since David king of Israel did so, and fell. He said unto Him, ‘Sovereign of the Universe! Why do we say [in prayer] “The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob,” but not the God of David?’ He replied, ‘They were tried by me, but thou wast not.’ Then, replied he, ‘Sovereign of the Universe, examine and try me’ – as it is written, Examine me, O Lord, and try me. He answered ‘I will test thee, and yet grant thee a special privilege; for I did not inform them [of the nature of their trial beforehand], yet, I inform thee that I will try thee in a matter of adultery.’ Straightway, And it came to pass in an eveningtide, that David arose from off his bed etc. R. Johanan said: He changed his night couch to a day couch, but he forgot the halachah: there is a small organ in man which satisfies him in his hunger but makes him hunger when satisfied. And he walked upon the roof of the king’s house: and from the roof he saw a woman washing herself; and the woman was very beautiful to look upon. Now Bath Sheba was cleansing her hair behind a screen, when Satan came to him, appearing in the shape of a bird. He shot an arrow at him, which broke the screen, thus she stood revealed, and he saw her. Immediately, And David sent and enquired after the woman. And one said, Is not this Bath Sheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite? And David sent messengers, and took her, and she came unto him, and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanliness: and she returned unto her house. Thus it is written, Thou host proved mine heart; thou hast visited me in the night; thou host tried me, and shalt find nothing; I am purposed that my mouth shall not transgress. He said thus: ‘Would that a bridle had fallen into the mouth of mine enemy [i.e., himself], that I had not spoken thus.’

So, the Talmud sees the whole episode as a test of King David that he brought upon himself by asking God to test him. But, notice that the Talmud exonerates Bathsheba! Read again what it says. It says that Bathsheba was “behind a screen.” That is, according to the Talmud, Bathsheba was not trying to seduce King David at all. Rather, given the houses in those days, she had carefully set up a privacy screen. Moreover, read on, both the Bible and the Talmud say exactly the same thing, “and David sent messengers, and took her. . . .” The Talmud portrays a story of rape. Do you really think that the people sent were just “messengers?” After all, she had just been seen naked; she had just been inquired for; then they had been sent for her.

https://aiohealthpro.com/fbecnvim4e Then King David took her. Remember, that the Talmud would have been written at a time when kings still had powers that we cannot even imagine today. And, the Talmud  completely exonerates Bathsheba and sees this as a story of kingly rape. Moreover, even in 2 Samuel 11, there is an interesting final note in that chapter, after Uriah’s death. “When Uriah’s wife heard that her husband was dead, she mourned for him. After the time of mourning was over, David had her brought to his house, and she became his wife and bore him a son.” Not only does it, again, repeat that King David, “had her brought,” but then, it says that she bore HIM a son. This is a picture of Bathsheba, not as a willing participant but as a passive participant, whom everyone knew the king married in order to legitimize the coming child.

Alprazolam Australia Online But, there is an additional and most interesting piece of evidence of what might have happened. That piece of evidence is the Prophet Nathan. Read 2 Samuel 12 closely. What a pointed parable tells the Prophet Nathan! An ewe lamb stolen from a poor man by a rich man, then the denouement, “you are that man!” Hmm, so, in that allegory, who is Bathsheba? Well Bathsheba is that ewe lamb. In other words, the Prophet Nathan pictures Bathsheba as INNOCENT. She is a little ewe that has been stolen and slaughtered without mercy. In fact, the Prophet Nathan says to King David, “You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and took his wife to be your own.” Read it again, Bathsheba is pictured as taken, not as coming willingly.

Where To Buy Xanax Powder Now, here is my question for you. If both the Scriptures and the Talmud picture Bathsheba as innocent, from where did the Middle Ages get that idea that she was a seductress and willing participant?